[game_edu] Brenda Braithwaite's game_edu rant at GDC

[Steven Yau]

I agree with the general notion that game designers should be capable
of making a game to some degree. However, with all the tools out
there, I don't expect them to be able to create a new engine or deal
with advanced AI algorithms that a programmer from a CS background
would be able to do.

They have to understand the process and underlying theory of creating
a game just like a furniture designer should be aware of the
manufacturing process but I don't expect them to build the tools
needed to create the product.

As long as they are aware of the process and limitations, I can't see
why they can't be a good games designer just because they can't
program.

Steven Yau

On 4 March 2011 16:46, John Hopson <john.hopson at gmail.com> wrote:

> (delurk)

>

> +1

>

> Erin's exactly right about the rising level of applicants.  My company is currently looking to hire a couple of games user researchers, and the quality of entry-level candidates we're seeing is phenomenal.  Between the general maturation of the field, improved games education (thanks, guys!), and the general economy we're getting some very impressive resumes even from new graduates.

>

> I get it that Brenda's rant may not be literally true, but it's still really good advice.  If a design candidate wants to stand out these days, programming is a really good way to do it.

>

> (relurk)