[game_edu] Research methods in games

[Ali Arya]

Ryan,


Apart from typical CS-based evaluation methods such as prototyping and walkthroughs which I'm sure you are familiar with, you may want to check out statistical analyses for quantitative user studies (from simple t-test and Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon to variations of ANOVA) or qualitative research methods such as emergent coding and grounded theory.


When it comes to human users, literature from psychology (individual level) and business (organizational level) are good sources of research methods. 




Hope this helps.


Best,


Ali Arya
/*===========================================================
Associate Professor of Interactive Multimedia
School of Information Technology, Carleton University, Ottawa
Phone: 613-520-2600 Ext. 4184
http://www.csit.carleton.ca/~arya
 
"You see things and say why,
I dream of things and say why not ..."
===========================================================*/





From: Malcolm Ryan
Sent: ‎Wednesday‎, ‎August‎ ‎20‎, ‎2014 ‎11‎:‎51‎ ‎PM
To: IGDA Game Education Listserv, Games Research Network





Dear Games Researchers,

One of the things I find both exciting and difficult about doing academic research in games is the diversity of research methodologies we bring from our various academic backgrounds. Personally, I am from a computer science background and was trained in the model of CS research: build a prototype to solve a problem, test it and gather data to compare it against other existing methodologies. This is simple as long as you are addressing objectively measurable properties of software, but naturally it becomes more complex when you add a human player to the mix, especially when you are trying to measure something as nebulous as 'engagement'.

Since delving into games research, I have started encountering (and even producing) research which does not fit in the narrow model of CS. I'm interested in knowing what other research methods are out there and what their standards of quality are. What disciplines do they come from? How must we adapt them to our own? Do we have any novel methodologies of our own?

I wonder whether it wouldn't be worth creating a guide to games research methods, categorising and contrasting the different approaches. Does anything like this already exist? If not, would anyone be interested in contributing to such a document?

Malcolm
_______________________________________________
game_edu mailing list
game_edu at igda.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/game_edu/attachments/20140821/46b3c787/attachment.html>