[games_access] SIG update!

[d. michelle hinn]

Well, they own this list so they are taking it down so either they 
accept that we keep things this way or we find another listserver and 
move the archives and such or go with the new web plan.  Sigh.

The only good part about the plan is that it will allow us to say 
"ok, 30 people in the GA SIG are IGDA members so they get x% of the 
membership fees." So far there has been no real way to track that 
(ie, they've never asked) and so no share of the IGDA membership has 
ever gone to SIGs. So that's the only brilliant thing I've heard yet.

Anyway, please be assured that I have many contingency plans. :)

Michelle

>Michelle,
>
>Please add my name to those who are absolutely opposed to the IGDA's 
>plans for messing up the Web system.
>
>As a developer, I want things Google-able.
>As a GA member, I do not want separate archives. Have enough 
>problems with that on other forums who've had to split archives for 
>various reasons.
>
>In fact, I might suggest that since WE, not the IGDA Lords and 
>Masters, are the GA SIG, we could just continue with this forum and 
>totally ignore any abomination they set up.
>
>So there!
>
>John
>
>_______________________________________________
>games_access mailing list
>games_access at igda.org
>http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access