[games_access] Audio games

[Thomas Westin]

Hi Brian,

I second that; it was the idea we also had with Terraformers; I previously made an audio game prototype but sighted gamers found it very hard to understand. It can be explained using Heideggers term 'breakdown', when something (e.g. a game) doesn't work the way you expect, a breakdown occurs, going from ready-to-hand to present-at-hand. (Now, looking back at Terraformers, it breaks many design rules so it is not a good UI example by far, but I just share your experience)

Best regards,
Thomas

On 10Jun 2013, at 6:38 PM, Brian Schmidt <brian at gamesoundcon.com> wrote:

> Ø  there is still some debate on whether or not an audiogame by definition can't *also* use any other supplemental stimuli to communicate as well.
> 
> Hello—I’m new to the list.
> I found that last point by John to be quite interesting.  I just finished developing what I consider to be an “audio game”, in that it uses sound as its primary gameplay element.  However I did find that when considering fully sighted players, some visual elements were very helpful (particularly for some features where I added VoiceOver feedback for the visually impaired player).  So in a strange way, adding visuals made the game more “accessible” to the fully sighted player, whom I found to be less likely to focus purely on the sound, even when I’d originally presented them with what was essentially a blank screen originally.
>  
> Brian Schmidt
> Founder, EarGames
> Executive Director, GameSoundCon
> Brian Schmidt Studios, LLC
>  
>  
> From: games_access-bounces at igda.org [mailto:games_access-bounces at igda.org] On Behalf Of John R. Porter
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 8:29 AM
> To: IGDA Games Accessibility SIG Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [games_access] Audio games
>  
> This seems to be mostly an issue of semantics.
> 
> In in the way that we typically use the phrase audiogame, it describes a game whose progression-critical information is communicated through sound. However, from what I've seen and heard from various users and developers, there is still some debate on whether or not an audiogame by definition can't *also* use any other supplemental stimuli to communicate as well.
> 
> Personally, when I'm explaining games that are accessible to those with complete visual impairment, I tend to describe them as "games that can be played with only audio," rather than "games that can't be played without audio." Again, it's largely a semantic difference. While the latter might technically be more accurate for a certain narrow, specialized definition of audiogame, I think the former is a bit more inclusive of different approaches to audio accessibility.
> 
> -John
> 
> -- -- -- -- --
> John R. Porter III
> www.jrp3.net
> University of Washington,
> Human Centered Design & Engineering
> 
>  
> 
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Sandra Uhling <sandra_uhling at web.de> wrote:
> Hello,
> there is an article that says:
> 
> Sander Huiberts, the operator of the website audiogames.net, said:
> "An audiogame is a game, that cannot be played without sound."
> 
> This is confusing. Did he really say this?
> Imagine blind games do no longer know if they really can play an "audio
> game".
> 
> Best regards,
> Sandra
> 
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> The main SIG website page is http://igda-gasig.org
>  
> _______________________________________________
> games_access mailing list
> games_access at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
> The main SIG website page is http://igda-gasig.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist7.pair.net/pipermail/games_access/attachments/20130610/98f48e71/attachment.htm>