[SBE] Timekeeping Standard [was RE: UTC Time Standard]

Jonathan Solomon jonstv at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 07:01:52 EDT 2009


Actually, I use 1/30 (or 29.97) of a second in our plant, not
1/10ths... :)

On another note, if we went metric, would we have to change our frame
rate?! :)

[For those that will reply that frame rate is based on power, not
measurement system, I'm just kidding...]

Jon
W3EIC
On Mar 25, 2009, at 12:14 AM, k7cr wrote:


> Gary -

>

> I can't fathom changing the number of days in a week...what irks me

> is that we use metric or base-10 time when we go beyond 1

> second...ie, 10ths of a second (we do the same in looking at

> longitude and lattitude,but that's for another day). Still like

> base 10 time - with the months left alone

>

> Clay

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: Gary Stewart

> To: sbe member discussion mail list

> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:45 AM

> Subject: Re: [SBE] Timekeeping Standard [was RE: UTC Time Standard]

>

> Changing hours, min. and seconds might work, but you can’t mess with

> nature and human nature without consequences. So, you are stuck

> with 365.25 day years and 7 day weeks. I think it was during the

> French revolution when they tried to go to a 10 day week. People

> couldn’t physically function with it.

>

> Gary Stewart

>

> From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of

> Sleeman Ken

> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:24 AM

> To: sbe member discussion mail list

> Cc: SBE EAS Remailer

> Subject: Re: [SBE] Timekeeping Standard [was RE: UTC Time Standard]

>

> I'm all for everything metric. I was very disappointed when

> President Carter's initiative to go metric back in the 70s failed. I

> use metric every chance I can.

>

> Making time 10 based makes all the sense in the world. Changing the

> calendar to 10 months of approximately 36.5 days each also makes

> sense to me.

>

> Ken Sleeman CSRE, CBNT

> Broadcast Engineer

> Arbitron, Inc.

> 9705 Patuxent Woods Drive

> Columbia, MD 21046

> ken.sleeman at arbitron.com

> 410-312-8747

>

>

> From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of

> Dan Mammone

> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:14

> To: 'sbe member discussion mail list'

> Cc: 'SBE EAS Remailer'

> Subject: [SBE] Timekeeping Standard [was RE: UTC Time Standard]

> That’s still an “English” approach. If we really wanted to create a

> new standard for timekeeping, we should steer away from the multiple

> units of time and go to a single unit… such as year (ensuring that

> our current leap year thing will be factored in). Then, make it

> “Metric”, where we use the respective prefix or suffix… Something

> like a Centon as heard in the original Battlestar Gallactica series,

> or more like a Stardate of Star Trek.

>

> Dan Mammone CBRE, CBNT

> Broadcast Engineer

> WMCO-FM/MCTV6

> Muskingum College

>

> <snip>

> For that matter - Why not go all the way and change our time keeping

> to base-10?. Look what happens today - We have Hours, Minutes,

> Seconds ...and what happens beyond that - We shift from base 12 to

> base 10 with 10th's of a second. Lets not just consider using UTC,

> but changing UTC to base-10. For example -

>

> Midnight would be 0.000 hours

> 0600 would be 2.5

> 1200 would be 5.0

> 1800 would be 7.5

> 2400 would be 10, or 0.000 depending on how you wanted to look at it.

>

> Each day would have 10 hours

> Each hour would have 10 minutes

> etc.

>

> Wait a minute ...It's not quite April yet.

>

> Clay Freinwald

>

>

>

>

> ______________________________________________________________________

> This e-mail has been scanned by Arbitron's Email Content Service.

> ______________________________________________________________________

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org

> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

>

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

> _______________________________________________

> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org

> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

>

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/sbe/attachments/20090325/cdf11760/attachment.html>


More information about the SBE mailing list