[SBE] Timekeeping Standard [was RE: UTC Time Standard]
Jonathan Solomon
jonstv at gmail.com
Wed Mar 25 07:01:52 EDT 2009
Actually, I use 1/30 (or 29.97) of a second in our plant, not
1/10ths... :)
On another note, if we went metric, would we have to change our frame
rate?! :)
[For those that will reply that frame rate is based on power, not
measurement system, I'm just kidding...]
Jon
W3EIC
On Mar 25, 2009, at 12:14 AM, k7cr wrote:
> Gary -
>
> I can't fathom changing the number of days in a week...what irks me
> is that we use metric or base-10 time when we go beyond 1
> second...ie, 10ths of a second (we do the same in looking at
> longitude and lattitude,but that's for another day). Still like
> base 10 time - with the months left alone
>
> Clay
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gary Stewart
> To: sbe member discussion mail list
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [SBE] Timekeeping Standard [was RE: UTC Time Standard]
>
> Changing hours, min. and seconds might work, but you can’t mess with
> nature and human nature without consequences. So, you are stuck
> with 365.25 day years and 7 day weeks. I think it was during the
> French revolution when they tried to go to a 10 day week. People
> couldn’t physically function with it.
>
> Gary Stewart
>
> From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of
> Sleeman Ken
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:24 AM
> To: sbe member discussion mail list
> Cc: SBE EAS Remailer
> Subject: Re: [SBE] Timekeeping Standard [was RE: UTC Time Standard]
>
> I'm all for everything metric. I was very disappointed when
> President Carter's initiative to go metric back in the 70s failed. I
> use metric every chance I can.
>
> Making time 10 based makes all the sense in the world. Changing the
> calendar to 10 months of approximately 36.5 days each also makes
> sense to me.
>
> Ken Sleeman CSRE, CBNT
> Broadcast Engineer
> Arbitron, Inc.
> 9705 Patuxent Woods Drive
> Columbia, MD 21046
> ken.sleeman at arbitron.com
> 410-312-8747
>
>
> From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of
> Dan Mammone
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:14
> To: 'sbe member discussion mail list'
> Cc: 'SBE EAS Remailer'
> Subject: [SBE] Timekeeping Standard [was RE: UTC Time Standard]
> That’s still an “English” approach. If we really wanted to create a
> new standard for timekeeping, we should steer away from the multiple
> units of time and go to a single unit… such as year (ensuring that
> our current leap year thing will be factored in). Then, make it
> “Metric”, where we use the respective prefix or suffix… Something
> like a Centon as heard in the original Battlestar Gallactica series,
> or more like a Stardate of Star Trek.
>
> Dan Mammone CBRE, CBNT
> Broadcast Engineer
> WMCO-FM/MCTV6
> Muskingum College
>
> <snip>
> For that matter - Why not go all the way and change our time keeping
> to base-10?. Look what happens today - We have Hours, Minutes,
> Seconds ...and what happens beyond that - We shift from base 12 to
> base 10 with 10th's of a second. Lets not just consider using UTC,
> but changing UTC to base-10. For example -
>
> Midnight would be 0.000 hours
> 0600 would be 2.5
> 1200 would be 5.0
> 1800 would be 7.5
> 2400 would be 10, or 0.000 depending on how you wanted to look at it.
>
> Each day would have 10 hours
> Each hour would have 10 minutes
> etc.
>
> Wait a minute ...It's not quite April yet.
>
> Clay Freinwald
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This e-mail has been scanned by Arbitron's Email Content Service.
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe
>
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe
> _______________________________________________
> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe
>
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/sbe/attachments/20090325/cdf11760/attachment.html>
More information about the SBE
mailing list