[SBE] Fwd: NAB FM chip proposal

[Fluker, Steve (CXR-Orlando)]

While as a radio broadcaster, I like anything that presents a need for
radio to continue to thrive, however, in this day of technology, doesn't
it seem more appropriate to have a system that would simply send
emergency text messages to cell phones (Make sure these messages are
exempt from text fees).  Texting is how people communicate today.  I can
hear it now, an EAS message going off on 1000 cell phones in the middle
of a prayer in a church service to tell us that there's a severe
thunderstorm 20 miles away.  Yes, in Florida we get daily storm alerts
in certain times of the year.  We had three sent in Orlando yesterday
alone.  

I have to agree with several of the previous comments that I've read.
First about the poor FM reception ability in a device such as a cell
phone unless headphones are plugged in.  Again, in today's technology,
the wired earpiece is becoming a thing of the past with Bluetooth
devices.  The other issue is battery life.  With all of the new features
in cell phones, on a busy day it can be a struggle for me to keep my
battery alive for a full day.  What good is the EAS built into a phone
if it drains the battery by 2 PM?

That's my two-cents.

Steve


Steve Fluker
Director of Engineering
Cox Radio, Orlando
4192 N. John Young Parkway
Orlando, FL 32804
PH   (321) 281-2037
Fax  (407) 291-6803



-----Original Message-----
From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of
Dennis C. Brown
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:21 AM
To: sbe member discussion mail list
Subject: Re: [SBE] Fwd: NAB FM chip proposal

Couldn't agree with you more, but no politician or bureaucrat is going 
to pass up the opportunity to show that he's done something to protect 
the public safety.

Curt Yengst wrote:

> At the risk of sounding cruel and heartless.....

> Do we really need a system that overrides every single communication

device within five feet of a person to tell them there's an emergency?
Has it really gotten to the point where we have to send alert tones and
offical messages to tell the average person TO GET IN OUT OF THE
@#$%#@!! RAIN???

>

> EAS is already the system radio people love to hate, and our listeners

are right behind us.  I've got an idea!  Let's put it on everyone's cell
phone!  I can hardly wait to hear the stream of profanity from my dad
(dragged kicking and screaming into the 20th century) when his
conversation is interrupted by a RWT.  (I'm exaggerating of course, but
you get the drift...)

>

> Here's my $0.02, and you probably have change coming....

> After reading some of your responses, I get the feeling some of you

might agree with me.  Let's not go back to the old CONELRAD, or EBS, or
whatever system.  Let's go back to PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.  If we at
the radio station have some urgent information, we'll get it on the air
pronto.  If you're not paying attention, oh well!  It sucks to be you!
The military calls it "Situational Awareness."  Get some!

>

> Here endeth the rant.  Thanks be to God.

>

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org on behalf of Richard Rudman

> Sent: Tue 3/31/2009 5:31 PM

> To: GRC GRC; EAS Committee SBE

> Cc: Chris Imlay; Poray John

> Subject: [SBE] Fwd: NAB FM chip proposal

>  

> Greetings from Washington:

>

> NAB has launched a major initiative to mandate FM radio chips in all  

> cellphones.

>

> Attached is an Adobe Reader presentation given by NAB at the EAS  

> Summit yesterday.

>

> They are marketing this idea as an enhancement to EAS.  Obviously  

> there are other benefits that would accrue to FM broadcasters. The EAS



> benefits may not be as clear cut as they think at this point.

>

> Obviously NAB is looking for other industry entities to back their  

> proposal. I recommend talking to NAB about this if the Board thinks  

> the idea has SBE member benefits. One could say that anything that  

> gets more radios in the hands of audience is a good thing for SBE  

> members. I think SBE could make some constructive suggestions to NAB  

> to make it more likely their proposal would have merit for emergency  

> public information and EAS.

>

> Here's my take on what they presented. Clay and Gary and Art were  

> there and can chime in with their takes.

>

> Advantages:

> 1. Users can tune to an FM station after getting a CMAS warning  

> (coming to you cellphone no sooner than 2010-2012 by some accounts)

> 2. FM is added universally to cellphones as an option

> 3. FM/RDS can display warning messages

> 4. Value added for cell phone users

> 5. Cost to add the chip is low - some phones already have them

>

> Disadvantages:

> 1. AM is left out in the cold

> 2. No recognition in existing cell FM chipsets for either SAME or CAP.

> 3. Not as many FM stations have news departments as AM stations and/or



> have prepared for severe emergency operations.

> 4. RDS data rate is only 1187.5 bit per second and has other uses now



> at RDS-capable stations.

> 5. Cellphone displays of RDS date would be restricted so EAS CAP  

> messages would require a lot of scrolling to read.

>

>

> FYI, the CTIA representative on the panel, Brian Joseph, Dir. of  

> Public Affairs for CTIA,  was cool to the idea -- possibly icy.

>

> Regards,

>

> Richard

>   

>

>

>   

>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> _______________________________________________

> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org

> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

>

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe