[SBE] 700 MHz wireless question

[Jeremy Morris]

I know Shure, AT, and Sennheiser have trade-in programs with rebates off of
the new high end gear.  My church has a bunch of Samson UHF receivers I got
to get rid of.  Any takers? :)

Jeremy

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Fluker, Steve (CXR-Orlando) <
Steve.Fluker at coxradio.com> wrote:


>  I would suggest that those of us who have a church home that we let them

> know.  Another fear is that a lot of these mics may suddenly appear on e-bay

> or other places and churchs may see these "great buys" and snap them up.

>

> Steve Fluker

>

> ------------------------------

> *From:* sbe-bounces at sbe.org on behalf of jer hill

> *Sent:* Mon 5/11/2009 9:48 AM

> *To:* sbe at hidden-valley.com; 'sbe member discussion mail list'

>

> *Subject:* Re: [SBE] 700 MHz wireless question

>

>   Jeff,

>

> Let's just say that it would depend on who is complaining... an engineer or

> lawyer.

>

> Best Regards,

>

> Jer Hill, K2JH

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org<sbe-bounces at sbe.org>]

> On Behalf Of Jeff

> Carter

> Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 9:31 PM

> To: sbe at sbe.org

> Subject: Re: [SBE] 700 MHz wireless question

>

> Hey Jer,

>

> I bet you five bucks that the current FCC does not have the political

> will to fine a church $10,000 for the illegal use of a wireless

> microphone.  Especially if they're guilty.

>

> I was just talking via email to our mutual friend Jay about this.

> Last time I attended the Dayton Hamfest, there were probably a hundred

> or more 700 Mhz wireless microphones for sale, most of them Lectros

> with some Shure and Sennheisers.  They will all end up in churches,

> and Public Safety folks, being elected officials themselves, will not

> file on a church.  At the outside, they'll have someone inside the

> church quietly change the frequencies.  Of course, if the churches can

> hear the Public Safety traffic, they'll just change the frequencies

> themselves and then nobody will ever be the wiser.

>

> This FCC does politics, not engineering.  Chris Imlay had an article

> in the SBE newsletter that said something to the effect that the FCC

> values engineers and lawyers somewhat differently...and we've arrived

> at the natural result of that.

>

> Jeff/KD4RBG

>

> ---- Original message ----

> >Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 19:25:31 -0700

> >From: "jer hill" <jerhil at verizon.net>

> >Subject: Re: [SBE] 700 MHz wireless question

> >To: "'sbe member discussion mail list'" <sbe at sbe.org>

> >

> >   Mic sellers neglected to tell the churches that they

> >   need to get a part 74 license that they probably

> >   don't qualify for. No church would willingly break

> >   the law, in my experience, however, the first

> >   $10,000 FCC fine to a church would be a real eye

> >   opener to the elders and deacons.

> >

> >

> >

> >   Best Regards,

> >

> >

> >

> >   Jer Hill

> >

> >   NFL Primary GDC

> >

> >   Seattle Seahawks

> _______________________________________________

> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org

> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

>

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

>

> _______________________________________________

> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org

> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

>

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

>

> _______________________________________________

> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org

> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

>

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/sbe/attachments/20090511/8465ad60/attachment.html>