[SBE] The future of Broadcasting.
Bob Reite
br at telcen.com
Thu Mar 18 17:52:12 EDT 2010
Several companies are already selling a "table radio" that has an RJ-45
jack or WiFi transceiver you connect your network some, such as the
Sanyo R227 also have an ordinary FM stereo radio. The devices typically
sell for about $120.00
Dan Slentz wrote:
> I see this discussion as going off topic (and I'm to blame too), but
> find it useful, interesting, and probably necessary. Putting on the
> "blinders" and saying this doesn't affect me eventually leads to "geez,
> now it affects me". Makes me think of the old saying about allowing
> things to happen and not standing up to say "no", then finding that when
> it happens to you there's no one left to say "no".
>
> Our field is broadcasting. Our specialty is engineering (though most of
> us know more than just engineering). I wonder how we got to this day
> when it really appears the government potentially could remove OTA TV
> from existence (if not a big part of OTA)? And where does it stop?
> Will Nextel, AT&T, Verizon, or some new unnamed corporation suggest to
> our government "hey, we'll give you $10B for all that 'wasted FM space',
> plus 15% gross" and the "powers that be" will then say (and honestly
> so), we can stream audio to cars over that specturm.. allow users to
> choose what they want/when they want it. Honestly, do any of us not
> see that a radio could (and maybe should) include audio streaming? And
> yes, that could easily come from cell spectrum and other places, but
> certainly there are/were options to taking away TV spectrum on this
> recent "initiative".
>
> So, my friends and collegues in broadcasting... where is the line
> between "this is an engineering topic" and "this is a political
> topic". Seems to me that the government has already blurred that line
> pretty well.
>
> As always... just an opiniion, for what it's worth.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* "chscherer at everestkc.net" <chscherer at everestkc.net>
> *To:* sbe member discussion mail list <sbe at sbe.org>
> *Sent:* Thu, March 18, 2010 11:30:01 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.
>
> Because others have said the same thing. And thank you for not
> respecting my opinion.
> I'm a member of this list, and I'm entitled to express an opinion. Just
> as you are.
>
> Nothing is being censored. The suggestpon was to take it to the
> appropriate outlet.
>
>
>
>
> >From Lee Howder <lee_howder at hotmail.com
> <mailto:lee_howder at hotmail.com>>
> Subject Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.
> Thanks chris but you should respect everyones opionion and let the
> moderator do his job. Why make a comment like this if it is not your
> business to do so? Why do you feel so entitled? I think that this topic
> has been the most interesting yet and it shouldn't be sensored. I'm
> sorry to everyone else for my off topic comment i will not make another.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chscherer at everestkc.net <mailto:chscherer at everestkc.net>
> Sent: 3/18/2010 2:33:26 PM
> To: sbe member discussion mail list
> Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.
>
>
> Some find this thread useful, some find it annoying. It has moved beyond
> the established scope of the list. And with the voiced opinions, it is
> ready to move to the more open forum of sbe-chat.
>
> I'm not the moderator, but that's my opinion.
> _______________________________________________
> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org <mailto:SBE at sbe.org>
> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe
>
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe
>
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe
More information about the SBE
mailing list