[game_edu] Implications of students going into a male-dominated, industry?

[Ian Schreiber]

Whoops, sorry for the reply-all, folks. *grumble grumble stupid defaults grumble*



________________________________
From: Ian Schreiber <ai864 at yahoo.com>
To: IGDA Game Education Listserv <game_edu at igda.org>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [game_edu] Implications of students going into a male-dominated, industry?


Sure, if you need a token white straight male on the panel ;-)
(I've heard from others that about a 50/50 split for a diversity-oriented panel is ideal, FWIW.)

In other news, any word on the ethics thing? I haven't heard anything at all from Andrew Ho, even wrote him an email last week asking for an update but still nothing. Hoping this doesn't fall through the cracks again... if it's a panel then would be nice to know the panelists so I can contact them, if a lecture I'm already prepared but would be good to know so I can be sure to bring the right materials.


Thanks,
- Ian



________________________________
From: Andrew Greenberg <hdiandrew at earthlink.net>
To: game_edu at igda.org
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [game_edu] Implications of students going into a male-dominated, industry?

Hey Ian, we have a session at SIEGE called "New Developers, New Audiences" about attracting both to the industry. You interested in being part of it?

Respectfully,
Andrew Greenberg
www.hauntedhousetycoon.com
www.holistic-design.com
www.siegecon.net


On 9/19/2011 10:00 AM, game_edu-request at igda.org wrote:

>

 Re: Implications of students going into a male-dominated

>        industry?

_______________________________________________
game_edu mailing list
game_edu at igda.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/game_edu/attachments/20110919/05dec128/attachment.htm>