[games_access] GDC -- Final Info on Phase One -- New!
d. michelle hinn
hinn at uiuc.edu
Sun Aug 10 18:22:31 EDT 2008
And if that wasn't confusing enough...most of the page headers on the
site say GDC 2007. Lol...
Michelle
>Haha! Why on earth haven't they changed that? Well, ok, that gives
>us a month of breathing room so things aren't AS crazy as I thought!
>It's still kind of crazy...but the crazy has been downgraded in
>intensity. ;)
>
>Michelle
>
>>Michelle,
>>
>>please note: the gdconf site says 08 still at the top, so Feb 18-22
>>is GDC 08!
>>
>>if you look at bit down on the start page, you'll find the 09
>>dates, which are
>>GDC 2009 takes place: March 23-27,
>>
>>/Thomas
>>
>>On 10 aug 2008, at 23.53, d. michelle hinn wrote:
>>
>>>Hi everyone,
>>>
>>>I'm now getting the "phase 1" proposals in final order for GDC
>>>2009. The submission process is a LOT different than it's been in
>>>the past (pasted below). We used to just wait until November and
>>>just received a "sorry your proposal was not accepted" or a
>>>"congrats your proposal was accepted" with no other explanation.
>>>Not this year...
>>>
>>>So our proposal work is not yet done (or at least we hope
>>>not...see next paragraph...)
>>>
>>>We will know very quickly if our proposals are rejected outright
>>>or conditionally accepted -- we will then need to resubmit the
>>>conditionally accepted proposals with the LONG version of the
>>>talks (I was wondering where that 4000-5000 word bit went!). We'll
>>>need to turn that around before November.
>>>
>>>After that, it will go back in review and we'll wait to hear
>>>whether or not we are officially accepted or rejected -- I've been
>>>told that we'll hear this sometime in November but possibly as
>>>late as December.
>>>
>>>So...given that GDC is from Feb 18-22, 2009 that does not leave
>>>people a whole lot of time to get travel arrangements, hotel, etc.
>>>and, yeah, that kind of sucks. So make sure your travel planning
>>>is flexible and that you can cancel plans if needed.
>>>
>>>Obviously this new system is good and bad. It's good because it
>>>will force all presenters to start planning their sessions well
>>>ahead of time and thus we'll have better sessions this year
>>>(hopefully!). It's also the first time we have EVER had the chance
>>>to receive feedback on our proposals. But...It's bad because we
>>>cannot submit the defense of our proposals (the 5000 word bit from
>>>the past) until it's been accepted through the open submission
>>>cycle. We are limited to a 400 word description. Any proposal that
>>>is rejected during this first phase...that's that. There is no
>>>other recourse. We might get one of the VERY few IGDA "second
>>>chance" slots but there are no guarantees.
>>>
>>>As soon as I hear back about the submissions, I will let everyone
>>>know so that we can (hopefully, finger's crossed, etc) start
>>>attacking the resubmissions.
>>>
>>>Sooo...good luck to us! Special thanks to Thomas and Kevin for
>>>their editing work! Now we wait and hope we get to go through this
>>>again in another month! :)
>>>
>>>Michelle
>>>
>>>----
>>>
>>>PHASE ONE (July 7th - August 11th, 2008)
>>>Initial Open Submission Cycle
>>>
>>>This is what we are finishing now
>>>
>>>PHASE TWO (August 11th - early September 2008)
>>>First Review and Resubmit Cycle
>>>
>>> * Advisory Board reviews submissions
>>> * Submitters are notified of their status: Declined or
>>>Conditionally Accepted
>>> * Submitters of Conditionally Accepted talks will be required
>>>at this time to prepare a largely complete presentation plan
>>>(which includes the presentation materials such as PPT slides) for
>>>Phase Three review*
>>>
>>> *Note: You are not a fully accepted speaker until your
>>>presentation plan is reviewed and approved by the advisory board
>>>
>>>PHASE THREE (November 2008)
>>>Final Review Cycle
>>>
>>> * Advisory Board reviews largely complete presentation plans,
>>>PPT slides, etc.
>>> * Submitters are notified of their final status: Declined or Accepted
>>> * Submitters who miss the deadline to submit their
>>>presentation plans for review will be automatically declined;
>>>exceptions will not be made
>>> * Submitters who sent in their presentation plans by the
>>>deadline but were not accepted to speak will receive a discount on
>>>a conference pass
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>games_access mailing list
>>><mailto:games_access at igda.org>games_access at igda.org
>>><http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access>http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>games_access mailing list
>>games_access at igda.org
>>http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>games_access mailing list
>games_access at igda.org
>http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/games_access
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist7.pair.net/pipermail/games_access/attachments/20080810/b7acddf4/attachment.htm>
More information about the games_access
mailing list