[CIS-PAGID] Autoimmune neutropenia and CVID - need advice
Richard Wasserman
drrichwasserman at gmail.com
Sun May 20 19:18:37 EDT 2012
I would worry about lymphoma or other clonal proliferation. Monoclonal
immunoglobulin production would be very unusual in the age group but I
guess anything is possible. (There could be an IgM/IgG producing clone) I'd
look at an immunoelectrophoresis and a PET scan. I'd also consider a more
extended study of her lymphocytes. I would not treat her with steroids, I
agree that you'd just be buying more trouble.
With regard to convincing her of the seriousness of her condition, perhaps
sending her for a second opinion to another major center (New York, Boston)
might be helpful.
Good luck,
Richard Wasserman
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Hsu, Florence <ida.hsu at yale.edu> wrote:
> Good question — I suppose it's the combination of ANC 0, apparent lack
> of response to G-CSF when tried at an outside hospital in the setting of an
> infection, and the fact that she is having some infections — certainly more
> than before, and she recently had some oral mucositis. Now on top of it
> all, her total IgG and IgM are "normal", so it'll be even harder to
> convince her she needs IV or SCIG.
> How often have people seen IgG and IgM levels normalize in a case like
> this? I am assuming it's the stress of her neutropenia and possibly
> infections driving a polyclonal humoral response.
>
> Ida
>
> From: <Kumar>, Ashish <Ashish.Kumar at cchmc.org>
> Reply-To: "pagid at list.clinimmsoc.org" <pagid at list.clinimmsoc.org>
> Date: Sunday, May 20, 2012 1:04 PM
> To: "pagid at list.clinimmsoc.org" <pagid at list.clinimmsoc.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [CIS-PAGID] Autoimmune neutropenia and CVID - need advice
>
> What is the indication to treat this neutropenia – just the number? If
> her marrow capacity to produce neutrophils is normal, which looks like it
> is, then the risk of infection from the neutropenia is not that high.
> Treating with steroids in this situation will only add more morbidity.
> Rituximab is better tolerated and less likely to cause serious problems but
> I urge that you consider the cost-benefit ratio. In my small experience, I
> have treated patients like this with observation only - one young woman
> has had an ANC of 0 for 3-4 years now; and no infections, granted while on
> IVIG. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Ashish Kumar****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* pagid-bounces at list.clinimmsoc.org [
> mailto:pagid-bounces at list.clinimmsoc.org<pagid-bounces at list.clinimmsoc.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *Nacho Gonzalez
> *Sent:* Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:50 AM
> *To:* pagid at list.clinimmsoc.org
> *Subject:* Re: [CIS-PAGID] Autoimmune neutropenia and CVID - need advice**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> I have a similar patient (now 9y.o) with brain granuloma three years
> ago.She developed autoimmune neutropenia,anemia and thrombopenia. Rituxan
> worked well (Charlotte's has experience in this condition... See previous
> discussions in this mailing list). Due to chronic hepatitis and lung
> disease she is now under cyclosporine...uneventfully. So I would try with
> rituxan,works well with autoimmune citopenias refractory to steroids and
> immunoglobulins.
> Best regards,****
>
> Luis Ignacio Gonzalez Granado
> Immunodeficiencies unit
> Hospital 12 octubre
> Madrid.Spain****
>
> El 20/05/2012 16:21, "Hsu, Florence" <ida.hsu at yale.edu> escribió:****
>
> Dear all,****
>
> ****
>
> I am looking for some advice and insight into a challenging case, I'd
> appreciate any help!****
>
> ****
>
> We have a young woman (22 yo) under our care with history of CVID
> diagnosed incidentally at age 11 (in setting of Lyme meningitis), managed
> conservatively without IVIG (just PRN antibiotics) due to minimal infection
> history, and lost to follow-up, until she presented a fewmonths ago with
> severe neutropenia, anti-neutrophil antibody positive, ANC 0. ****
>
> ** **
>
> She is anemic and direct Coomb’s positive now as well. BM biopsy was
> hypercellular with prominent lymphoid aggregates and small granulomas
> consistent with CVID, FISH and cytogenetics were normal. She had no
> significant response to an initial trial of G-CSF.****
>
> ****
>
> Of note, this patient has been extremely resistant to therapy to date,
> refusing IVIG, as she has “managed so well” clinically without it so far,
> and quite frankly she is having a hard time accepting the fact that she has
> a serious illness that may require aggressive therapy.****
>
> ****
>
> My first question is: what are the best therapeutic options for the
> neutropenia? We are considering rituximab, but the hematologists here have
> limited experience with this in the setting of AIN. She has also been very
> resistant to IVIG, which we feel is important for her to receive prior to
> any rituximab, as that would affect her already defective humoral
> immunity. Should we just startwith corticosteroids, and how safe is that
> without IgG coverage?****
>
> ****
>
> Question #2: Her IgG levels have actually increased from 388 in 2009, to
> 565 (around the onset of her neutropenia this spring), to 950 a month
> later! We assume that this is not “normal” IgG, as she historically has
> not been able to mount a significant response to vaccinations, and recently
> had little IgG2 but elevated IgG3, would others agree? Has anybody
> seenthis before, and does she still warrant IgG replacement (with or
> without her neutropenia)? Recent CT done at outside hospital (in setting
> of bronchial infection at onset of neutropenia) did show mild
> mediastinal/para-aortic lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, mild bronchiectatic
> changes, and bilateral nodular infiltrates <2cm size****
>
> ****
>
> Question #3: She is returning tomorrow for repeat post-vaccination titers
> (conjugated pneumococcal, meningococcal, and Tdap) – what other labs would
> you suggest we check?****
>
> ****
>
> Thank you so much for your help!!!****
>
> ****
>
> Sincerely, ****
>
> Ida Hsu****
>
> Section of Allergy and Immunology****
>
> Yale University School of Medicine****
>
> Phone: (203) 785-4143****
>
> Fax: (203) 785-3229****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Her labs to date if you are interested, note that she has NEVER received
> IVIG:****
>
> ****
>
> Vaccine history:****
>
> Meningitis vaccine – 2008, N. meningitidis IgG undetectable in 7/09****
>
> Pneumovax – 8/21/09, responded to 3/12 serotypes****
>
> Conjugated pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccines – 1/15/10 (lost to
> follow-up, immediate post-vaccination titers not checked, but titers to
> both were all low when checked in 3/12)****
>
> ****
>
> 8/15/97 ****
>
> IgG 466****
>
> IgA 10****
>
> IgM 8****
>
> VZV Ab negative****
>
> ****
>
> 10/27/03****
>
> IgG 521****
>
> IgA 7****
>
> IgG1 361****
>
> IgG2 undetectable****
>
> IgG3 112****
>
> IgG4 undetectable****
>
> HIB 0.31****
>
> Tetanus <0.10****
>
> Flow – lymphopenia noted, predominantly affecting T, NK cells. CD3+ 646,
> CD4+ 405, CD8+ 189****
>
> ****
>
> 1/3/09 ****
>
> IgG 405****
>
> IgA 10****
>
> IgM 26****
>
> WBC 2.5****
>
> ANC 1790****
>
> ALC 380****
>
> EBV VCA-IgM positive****
>
> ****
>
> 7/31/09****
>
> IgG 492****
>
> IgA <7****
>
> IgM 21****
>
> IgE <2****
>
> Pneumococcal – all <.22 except for serotype 5 – 0.46****
>
> Neisseria meningitidis IgG – all undetectable (prev vaccinated for college)
> ****
>
> HIB 3.0****
>
> Tetanus <0.10****
>
> VZV indeterminate****
>
> EBV-VCA IgG Positive****
>
> Flow cytometry - absolute decrease in T, NK, B cells. CD3+ 568, CD4+ 349,
> CD8+ 156, CD45RA+ 225, CD45RA+ 218, NK 31, CD19+ 69****
>
> ****
>
> 10/12/09****
>
> IgG 388****
>
> IgA <7****
>
> IgM 14****
>
> IgE <2****
>
> Pneumococcal 3/14 titers >1 - 5, 18C, 19F (post–vaccination on 8/21/09)**
> **
>
> ****
>
> 7/24/10 ****
>
> IgG 386****
>
> IgM 16****
>
> IgA 6****
>
> ****
>
> Outside hospital 2/27 –3/5/12:****
>
> Sputum PCP negative****
>
> Influenza A/B Ab negative****
>
> Legionella Ag negative****
>
> Parvovirus B19 IgG, IgM negative****
>
> CMV DNA negative****
>
> Strep pneumo Ag negative****
>
> IgG 418, IgA 9, IgM 280****
>
> Flow cytometry:****
>
> CD45+ lymphocytes 0.4****
>
> CD3+ 354****
>
> CD19+ 18****
>
> CD 16/56+ 17****
>
> CD4+ 285****
>
> CD8+ 59****
>
> H/S ratio 4.9 (>1)****
>
> ****
>
> CBCs in early March: ****
>
> WBC 0.8 – 1.3 (as low as 0.7 on 2/27)****
>
> ANC 0.1 – 0.2 (as low as 1% of 3.88 on 3/04, 3% of 4.06 on 3/04)****
>
> Hgb 10.9 – 12.2****
>
> Plts 95 – 107 (as low as 60 on 2/27)****
>
> ****
>
> 3/07/12****
>
> IgG 565****
>
> IgM 553****
>
> IgA <7****
>
> IgE <2****
>
> IgG1 308****
>
> IgG2 16****
>
> IgG3 294 (elevated)****
>
> IgG4 <0.2****
>
> Histoplasma ID neg****
>
> Flow cytometry – marked leukopenia, lymphopenia. Increase in CD45RO
> positive cells for age. Marked non-specific binding of Ig to B cells.
> CD4+ 598, CD8+ 101****
>
> HIB 1.8****
>
> Pneumococcal Abs – all low,*<*0.26****
>
> Tetanus <0.10****
>
> N meningitidis negative to A, C, Y, W-135 serogroups****
>
> HBV SAb, CoreAb, SAg negative****
>
> HIV 1/2 negative****
>
> HCV negative****
>
> CMV PCR negative****
>
> Parvo B19 PCR negative****
>
> DAT Coombs negative****
>
> LDH 184****
>
> ACE 49****
>
> Anti-neutrophil Ab – POSITIVE. "Neutrophil reactive antibodies (IgM only)
> and class I HLA antibodies were detected in the patient's sample. The
> reactivity against neutrophils was still present following absorption with
> normal donor platelets (removes class I HLA antibodies)."****
>
> ****
>
> 3/13****
>
> Vitamin B12 1076****
>
> Folic Acid 815****
>
> DAT negative****
>
> ****
>
> 4/9/12****
>
> IgG 950****
>
> IgM 692****
>
> IgA 8****
>
> B. pertussis Ab 0.2****
>
> CBC 1.0/11.7/126, ANC 0.0****
>
> ****
>
> 5/1/12****
>
> ABO Group/Rh B+****
>
> Ab screen negative****
>
> DAT Positive (IgG Positive, C3 Positive)****
>
> CBC 0.7/8.8/128****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Imaging:****
>
> 2/27/12 - CT C/A/P****
>
> Mild mediastinal and para-aortic adenopathy****
>
> Moderate splenomegaly****
>
> Multiple bilateral nodular consolidations <2 cm w/centrilobular infiltrates
> ****
>
> Multiple hypodense lesions in both kidneys, up to 1.9cm, may represent
> renal carbuncle, masses, or less likely infarcts. Bilateral renal scarring
> is noted.****
>
> ****
>
> 5/1/12 CXR****
>
> Clustered nodular opacities in the right midlung similar to that seen on
> prior chest CT from 2/27/2012 and likely represent focal areas of bronchial
> impaction with possible developing bronchopneumonia. Mild bronchiectatic
> changes again seen bilaterally, better appreciated on the prior CT.****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
> F. Ida Hsu, M.D.****
>
> Section of Allergy and Immunology****
>
> Yale University School of Medicine****
>
> Phone: (203) 785-4143****
>
> Fax: (203) 785-3229****
>
--
Richard L. Wasserman, MD, PhD
DallasAllergyImmunology
7777 Forest Lane, Suite B-332
Dallas, Texas 75230
Office (972) 566-7788
Fax (972) 566-8837
Cell (214) 697-7211
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/private/pagid/attachments/20120520/30950fbb/attachment.html>
More information about the PAGID
mailing list