[sbe-eas] Question for the group about the new MEP EAS Code

[Rob Dale]

Let the "and" roll off the tongue 🙂 A missing person who is not in danger - is not a public emergency.

Rob

________________________________
From: sbe-eas <sbe-eas-bounces at sbe.org> on behalf of mlangner at swcp.com <mlangner at swcp.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2024 11:04 AM
To: 'SBE EAS Exchange - a mail list for discussion about the Emergency Alert System and other emergency communication issues.' <sbe-eas at sbe.org>
Subject: [sbe-eas] Question for the group about the new MEP EAS Code


Hello everyone !

Please allow me to ask a question about the new MEP EAS code.

A New Mexico father is angry and is complaining that the media didn’t carry alerts about his missing adult son.

There is no evidence that the missing adult son is endangered in any way.

So, here’s my request for clarification.

Is MEP designed for:

            (1) persons who are simultaneously missing and endangered, or

            (2) persons who are missing but may or may not be endangered?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist7.pair.net/pipermail/sbe-eas/attachments/20240817/21759786/attachment.htm>