[sbe-eas] Question for the group about the new MEP EAS Code

[mlangner at swcp.com]

I sure agree – and a local angry father does not!

Many thanks!

Mike/
_____________________________________

 

Mike Langner
929 Alameda Road NW
Albuquerque, NM 87114-1901

(505) 898-3212 home/home office
(505) 238-8810 cell
mlangner at swcp.com <mailto:mlangner at swcp.com> 



 

From: sbe-eas <sbe-eas-bounces at sbe.org> On Behalf Of Rob Dale
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2024 9:12 AM
To: SBE EAS Exchange - a mail list for discussion about the Emergency Alert System and other emergency communication issues. <sbe-eas at sbe.org>
Subject: Re: [sbe-eas] Question for the group about the new MEP EAS Code

 

Let the "and" roll off the tongue 🙂 A missing person who is not in danger - is not a public emergency.

 

Rob

 

  _____  

From: sbe-eas <sbe-eas-bounces at sbe.org <mailto:sbe-eas-bounces at sbe.org> > on behalf of mlangner at swcp.com <mailto:mlangner at swcp.com>  <mlangner at swcp.com <mailto:mlangner at swcp.com> >
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2024 11:04 AM
To: 'SBE EAS Exchange - a mail list for discussion about the Emergency Alert System and other emergency communication issues.' <sbe-eas at sbe.org <mailto:sbe-eas at sbe.org> >
Subject: [sbe-eas] Question for the group about the new MEP EAS Code 

 

Hello everyone !

Please allow me to ask a question about the new MEP EAS code.

A New Mexico father is angry and is complaining that the media didn’t carry alerts about his missing adult son.

There is no evidence that the missing adult son is endangered in any way.

So, here’s my request for clarification.

Is MEP designed for:

            (1) persons who are simultaneously missing and endangered, or

            (2) persons who are missing but may or may not be endangered?



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist7.pair.net/pipermail/sbe-eas/attachments/20240817/0d91d945/attachment-0001.htm>