[SBE] Ultrasonic Leak Detection

Chris Spacone cspacone at socal.rr.com
Fri May 16 17:46:18 EDT 2008


Cowboy,

The Boss (tm) is a pretty reasonable guy and he will probably bite on the
$200 expenditure. From the feedback it sounds like Ultrasonic is viable. If
he gets me the tool Ill post again you guys know how it turns out.

73,
Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of Cowboy
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 2:30 PM
To: sbe member discussion mail list
Subject: Re: [SBE] Ultrasonic Leak Detection

On Friday 16 May 2008 01:42 pm, Bill Whitt wrote:

>

> This would be a tough call for me if I had to make a decision between

vacuum

> or pressure leak detection.


Just depends on whether you want your vacuum inside, or outside !
;)

Personally, I'd never want to use a vacuum inside a transmission line,
be it wave guide or hard line, or other. It pretty much guarantees you'll
push
( pull ? Does it matter ? ) atmospheric water into the line, which will
then need
purged, even if it doesn't rupture seals designed for pressure in the other
direction.

I'll be real interested in real world experience with a sonic detector
though,
with TX blowers running, HVAC, and all the rest.

--
Cowboy

http://cowboys.homeip.net

"The medium is the massage."
-- Crazy Nigel

_______________________________________________
SBE mailing list
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe
_______________________________________________
SBE at sbe.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3106 (20080516) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3106 (20080516) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




More information about the SBE mailing list