[SBE] The future of Broadcasting.

[Christensen, Dave]

Perfect that will be awsome!!! 

-----Original Message-----
From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of Bill
Barber
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:03 PM
To: sbe member discussion mail list
Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.

Remember that Blaupunkt Berlin already markets an IP car radio (in
addition to AM-FM-IBOC-Satellite, and porobably shortwave knowing
Blaupunkt).  wb


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Reite" <br at telcen.com>
To: "sbe member discussion mail list" <sbe at sbe.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:52:12 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.

Several companies are already selling a "table radio" that has an RJ-45
jack or WiFi transceiver you connect your network some, such as the
Sanyo R227 also have an ordinary FM stereo radio.  The devices typically
sell for about $120.00

Dan Slentz wrote:

> I see this discussion as going off topic (and I'm to blame too), but 

> find it useful, interesting, and probably necessary.  Putting on the 

> "blinders" and saying this doesn't affect me eventually leads to 

> "geez, now it affects me".  Makes me think of the old saying about 

> allowing things to happen and not standing up to say "no", then 

> finding that when it happens to you there's no one left to say "no".

>  

> Our field is broadcasting.  Our specialty is engineering (though most 

> of us know more than just engineering).  I wonder how we got to this 

> day when it really appears the government potentially could remove OTA

TV

> from existence (if not a big part of OTA)?   And where does it stop?  

> Will Nextel, AT&T, Verizon, or some new unnamed corporation suggest to



> our government "hey, we'll give you $10B for all that 'wasted FM 

> space', plus 15% gross" and the "powers that be" will then say (and 

> honestly so), we can stream audio to cars over that specturm.. allow

users to

> choose what they want/when they want it.   Honestly, do any of us not 

> see that a radio could (and maybe should) include audio streaming?

And 

> yes, that could easily come from cell spectrum and other places, but 

> certainly there are/were options to taking away TV spectrum on this 

> recent "initiative".

>  

> So, my friends and collegues in broadcasting... where is the line 

> between "this is an engineering topic" and "this is a political

> topic".   Seems to me that the government has already blurred that

line 

> pretty well.

>  

> As always... just an opiniion, for what it's worth.

>  

> 

>  

> 

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> --

> *From:* "chscherer at everestkc.net" <chscherer at everestkc.net>

> *To:* sbe member discussion mail list <sbe at sbe.org>

> *Sent:* Thu, March 18, 2010 11:30:01 AM

> *Subject:* Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.

> 

> Because others have said the same thing. And thank you for not 

> respecting my opinion.

> I'm a member of this list, and I'm entitled to express an opinion. 

> Just as you are.

> 

> Nothing is being censored. The suggestpon was to take it to the 

> appropriate outlet.

> 

> 

> 

> 

>  >From  Lee Howder  <lee_howder at hotmail.com 

> <mailto:lee_howder at hotmail.com>> Subject  Re: [SBE] The future of 

> Broadcasting.

> Thanks chris but you should respect everyones opionion and let the 

> moderator do his job. Why make a comment like this if it is not your 

> business to do so? Why do you feel so entitled? I think that this 

> topic has been the most interesting yet and it shouldn't be sensored. 

> I'm sorry to everyone else for my off topic comment i will not make

another.

> 

> 

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: chscherer at everestkc.net <mailto:chscherer at everestkc.net>

> Sent: 3/18/2010 2:33:26 PM

> To: sbe member discussion mail list

> Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.

> 

> 

> Some find this thread useful, some find it annoying. It has moved 

> beyond the established scope of the list. And with the voiced 

> opinions, it is ready to move to the more open forum of sbe-chat.

> 

> I'm not the moderator, but that's my opinion.

> _______________________________________________

> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org <mailto:SBE at sbe.org> To unsubscribe, 

> go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

> 

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

> 

> 

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> --

> 

> _______________________________________________

> The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org

> To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

> 

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe
_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe