[SBE] Lack of Comments in NPRM 13-249 from Individual AM Broadcast Station Owners-Operators-Engineers

[Mark Heller]

Dale,
Are you sure, the General Public is allowed to enter 'Reply Comments'?
I certainly would hope so, but I've never heard of that.... just thought 
that
the 156 filers would respond only.

----------------------------------------
From: "Dale Gehman" <dgehman at gradiotv.com>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 8:45 AM
To: sbe at sbe.org
Cc: dgehman at gradiotv.com
Subject: Re: [SBE] Lack of Comments in NPRM 13-249 from Individual AM 
Broadcast Station Owners-Operators-Engineers

Notice to all Individual AM Broadcast Station Owners-Operators-Engineers;  


I am saddened to see that you have NOT filed Comments to the FCC in the
current AM Revitalization NPRM 13-249!

FCC NPRM 13-249's Reply Comment Period has been extended to March 20th -
which means you do have the time submit Comments in this proceeding!

Here are my original NPRM 13-249 Comments filed with the FCC on January 
22,
2014.  http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017584478  

You may agree or disagree with my Comments filed in NPRM 13-249; but if 
you
will not participate in filing Comments in this important proceeding - 
then
please don't complain when the NPRM is adopted as proposed by the FCC -
which will not provide  any immediate or viable solutions to slow the AM
Band's demise.

Shame on us;  AM Owners/Operators/Engineers - for not caring enough to 
take
the time to prepare and file Reply Comments to the FCC in NPRM 13-294.

Rand Dale Gehman - GC&C
Email:  dgehman at gradiotv.com 
Web:  www.gradiotv.com  

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/sbe/attachments/20140217/2afe7550/attachment.htm>