[SBE] Anyone can File Comments during the Reply Comments Period

[Dale Gehman]

Yes - to quote a Communications Attorney Friend;  "There is no restriction
in a party filing for the first time on reply in a rulemaking proceeding"
(at the FCC)

I was also pleasantly surprised with the fact that anyone can file Reply
Comments - as I was also under the impression that Reply Comment were only
for those who filed Comments in the original filing window.  (Again - that
is no longer the case per qualified Counsel that practices before the
Commission.)

Randy Dale Gehman - GC&C
Email:  dgehman at gradiotv.com
Web:  www.gradiotv.com  

-----Original Message-----
From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org] On Behalf Of
sbe-request at sbe.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:01 AM
To: sbe at sbe.org
Subject: SBE Digest, Vol 582, Issue 1

Send SBE mailing list submissions to
	sbe at sbe.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	sbe-request at sbe.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	sbe-owner at sbe.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of SBE digest..."


SBE Roundtable

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Lack of Comments in NPRM 13-249 from Individual AM
      Broadcast Station Owners-Operators-Engineers (Mark Heller)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:08:11 -0500
From: "Mark Heller" <wgbw at lsol.net>
Subject: Re: [SBE] Lack of Comments in NPRM 13-249 from Individual AM
	Broadcast Station Owners-Operators-Engineers
To: "sbe member discussion mail list" <sbe at sbe.org>
Message-ID: <7f405326$732f372$5448eb1b$@lsol.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Dale,
Are you sure, the General Public is allowed to enter 'Reply Comments'?
I certainly would hope so, but I've never heard of that.... just thought
that the 156 filers would respond only.

----------------------------------------
From: "Dale Gehman" <dgehman at gradiotv.com>
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 8:45 AM
To: sbe at sbe.org
Cc: dgehman at gradiotv.com
Subject: Re: [SBE] Lack of Comments in NPRM 13-249 from Individual AM
Broadcast Station Owners-Operators-Engineers

Notice to all Individual AM Broadcast Station Owners-Operators-Engineers;  


I am saddened to see that you have NOT filed Comments to the FCC in the
current AM Revitalization NPRM 13-249!

FCC NPRM 13-249's Reply Comment Period has been extended to March 20th -
which means you do have the time submit Comments in this proceeding!

Here are my original NPRM 13-249 Comments filed with the FCC on January 22,
2014.  http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017584478  

You may agree or disagree with my Comments filed in NPRM 13-249; but if you
will not participate in filing Comments in this important proceeding - then
please don't complain when the NPRM is adopted as proposed by the FCC -
which will not provide  any immediate or viable solutions to slow the AM
Band's demise.

Shame on us;  AM Owners/Operators/Engineers - for not caring enough to take
the time to prepare and file Reply Comments to the FCC in NPRM 13-294.

Rand Dale Gehman - GC&C
Email:  dgehman at gradiotv.com
Web:  www.gradiotv.com  

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/sbe/attachments/20140217/2afe7550/attac
hment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable
SBE mailing list
SBE at sbe.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe


End of SBE Digest, Vol 582, Issue 1
***********************************