[game_edu] game_edu Digest, Vol 51, Issue 5
Jim Parker
jparker at ucalgary.ca
Tue Jan 13 12:54:16 EST 2009
Oh-oh. You've done it now! :-)
Jim
Mark Baldwin wrote:
>
> Ian is correct. I would also like to note that you seemed to equate
> ‘game’ with ‘simulation’ as being redundant. I would suggest that they
> are not. While it can be argued that all electronic games (especially
> serious games) are simulations, the reverse is not true. All
> simulations are not games. In this context, game implies both
> interactivity and possibly goal orientation that is not characteristic
> to simulations in general.
>
> Mark
>
> ************************************
>
> *Mark Lewis Baldwin*
>
> /Baldwin Consulting/
>
> 685 Trailside Rd
>
> Golden, CO 80401
>
> 303-526-9169
>
> 303-408-3727 (m)
>
> mark at baldwinconsulting.org <mailto:mark at baldwinconsulting.org>
>
> http://baldwinconsulting.org
>
> ************************************
>
> *From:* game_edu-bounces at igda.org [mailto:game_edu-bounces at igda.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Ian Schreiber
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:06 AM
> *To:* IGDA Game Education Listserv
> *Subject:* Re: [game_edu] game_edu Digest, Vol 51, Issue 5
>
> "Serious games" is already a term in common use in the field. I think
> it was coined by Ben Sawyer, meant to describe the use of games in a
> context that is primarily productive in nature (as opposed to
> primarily for entertainment).
>
> In this context, a sporting event is not a "serious game"... no matter
> how much it means to you personally ;-)
>
> Is there a reason you find this particular term redundant or
> unnecessary, or am I just totally failing to understand your point?
>
> - Ian
>
> --- On *Tue, 1/13/09, J. Klabbers /<jklabbers at kmpc.nl>/* wrote:
>
> From: J. Klabbers <jklabbers at kmpc.nl>
> Subject: Re: [game_edu] game_edu Digest, Vol 51, Issue 5
> To: game_edu at igda.org
> Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2009, 5:32 AM
>
> See Item 1: PhD position in Serious Gaming (S. Gold)
>
> A matter of terminology in professional communication.
>
> In the announcement below the following phrasing is curious: "The
> Department of Industrial Design at the Eindhoven University of
> Technology has an opportunity you can take to join a team for
> development of serious games for medical simulation, with a focus
> on birth delivery".
>
> Suppose we would agree that the forthcoming match between
> Manchester United and Liverpool is a serious game. For the sake of
> clear professional communication, wouldn't be more suitable to
> rephrase the line, reading: "The Department of Industrial Design
> at the Eindhoven University of Technology has an opportunity you
> can take to join a team for development of medical simulation,
> with a focus on birth delivery".
>
> That would make the term "serious game" as redundant as it is in
> this context, or am I missing something special?
>
> I am looking forward to the day that we may receive an advert for
> a PhD position in Non-Serious Gaming, whatever that would mean.
>
> J. Klabbers
>
> jklabbers at kmpc.nl <mailto:jklabbers at kmpc.nl>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> game_edu mailing list
> game_edu at igda.org
> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_edu
>
--
--
Home
.........................................................................
One day Alice came to a fork in the road and saw
a Cheshire cat in a tree. "Which road do I take?" she asked. "Where
do you want to go?" was his response. "I don't know," Alice answered.
"Then," said the cat, "it doesn't matter."
.........................................................................
Dr. J. R. Parker, Digital Media Laboratory
Professor of Play http://www.ucalgary.ca/~jparker
Faculty of Fine Arts (Drama) jparker@ ucalgary. ca
University of Calgary 403-220-6784
AB606/AB611
More information about the game_edu
mailing list