[game_edu] game_edu Digest, Vol 51, Issue 5

Jim Parker jparker at ucalgary.ca
Tue Jan 13 12:54:16 EST 2009


Oh-oh. You've done it now! :-)

Jim

Mark Baldwin wrote:

>

> Ian is correct. I would also like to note that you seemed to equate

> ‘game’ with ‘simulation’ as being redundant. I would suggest that they

> are not. While it can be argued that all electronic games (especially

> serious games) are simulations, the reverse is not true. All

> simulations are not games. In this context, game implies both

> interactivity and possibly goal orientation that is not characteristic

> to simulations in general.

>

> Mark

>

> ************************************

>

> *Mark Lewis Baldwin*

>

> /Baldwin Consulting/

>

> 685 Trailside Rd

>

> Golden, CO 80401

>

> 303-526-9169

>

> 303-408-3727 (m)

>

> mark at baldwinconsulting.org <mailto:mark at baldwinconsulting.org>

>

> http://baldwinconsulting.org

>

> ************************************

>

> *From:* game_edu-bounces at igda.org [mailto:game_edu-bounces at igda.org]

> *On Behalf Of *Ian Schreiber

> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:06 AM

> *To:* IGDA Game Education Listserv

> *Subject:* Re: [game_edu] game_edu Digest, Vol 51, Issue 5

>

> "Serious games" is already a term in common use in the field. I think

> it was coined by Ben Sawyer, meant to describe the use of games in a

> context that is primarily productive in nature (as opposed to

> primarily for entertainment).

>

> In this context, a sporting event is not a "serious game"... no matter

> how much it means to you personally ;-)

>

> Is there a reason you find this particular term redundant or

> unnecessary, or am I just totally failing to understand your point?

>

> - Ian

>

> --- On *Tue, 1/13/09, J. Klabbers /<jklabbers at kmpc.nl>/* wrote:

>

> From: J. Klabbers <jklabbers at kmpc.nl>

> Subject: Re: [game_edu] game_edu Digest, Vol 51, Issue 5

> To: game_edu at igda.org

> Date: Tuesday, January 13, 2009, 5:32 AM

>

> See Item 1: PhD position in Serious Gaming (S. Gold)

>

> A matter of terminology in professional communication.

>

> In the announcement below the following phrasing is curious: "The

> Department of Industrial Design at the Eindhoven University of

> Technology has an opportunity you can take to join a team for

> development of serious games for medical simulation, with a focus

> on birth delivery".

>

> Suppose we would agree that the forthcoming match between

> Manchester United and Liverpool is a serious game. For the sake of

> clear professional communication, wouldn't be more suitable to

> rephrase the line, reading: "The Department of Industrial Design

> at the Eindhoven University of Technology has an opportunity you

> can take to join a team for development of medical simulation,

> with a focus on birth delivery".

>

> That would make the term "serious game" as redundant as it is in

> this context, or am I missing something special?

>

> I am looking forward to the day that we may receive an advert for

> a PhD position in Non-Serious Gaming, whatever that would mean.

>

> J. Klabbers

>

> jklabbers at kmpc.nl <mailto:jklabbers at kmpc.nl>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

> _______________________________________________

> game_edu mailing list

> game_edu at igda.org

> http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_edu

>


--
--
Home
.........................................................................
One day Alice came to a fork in the road and saw
a Cheshire cat in a tree. "Which road do I take?" she asked. "Where
do you want to go?" was his response. "I don't know," Alice answered.
"Then," said the cat, "it doesn't matter."
.........................................................................

Dr. J. R. Parker, Digital Media Laboratory
Professor of Play http://www.ucalgary.ca/~jparker
Faculty of Fine Arts (Drama) jparker@ ucalgary. ca
University of Calgary 403-220-6784
AB606/AB611



More information about the game_edu mailing list