[SBE] SBE Digest, Vol 264, Issue 7

[Bill Harris]

Amen!!

-----Original Message-----
From: sbe-bounces at sbe.org [mailto:sbe-bounces at sbe.org]On Behalf Of Barry
Thomas, CPBE CBNT
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 5:03 PM
To: SBE Member Discussion List
Subject: Re: [SBE] SBE Digest, Vol 264, Issue 7


OK... I'm not the moderator but it's safe to say we're officially off topic.
We need to bring it back before we get bounced to the "SBE-CHAT" list.


Let's bring it back to the industry...it was proposed on this list that we
need to take what we learn about these developments and make our voices
heard!  Good points!

Contact your Senators and Reps!  Respond with your vote if you disagree with
their position!

But in addition,

- What would you like the Society to do on your behalf?  Is there a
compelling member interest that the Society should take an aggressive
position on decidedly "industry" issue?


Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: sbe-request at sbe.org
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:29:46
To: <sbe at sbe.org>
Subject: SBE Digest, Vol 264, Issue 7

Send SBE mailing list submissions to
	sbe at sbe.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	sbe-request at sbe.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	sbe-owner at sbe.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SBE digest..."


SBE Roundtable

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: The future of Broadcasting. (Edwin Bukont)
   2. Re: The future of Broadcasting. (Francis Martin)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:15:35 -0400
From: Edwin Bukont <ebukont at msn.com>
Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.
To: sbe <sbe at sbe.org>
Message-ID: <SNT109-W57A1EC33CED4F2A5C84A02A92D0 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Oh yeah, that's right, and we never found the exact reason for all those
underground cities designed with French and German know how.   You build a
shelter for what purpose?

Edwin Bukont CSRE, DRB, CBNT
V- 240.417.2475; F- 240.368.1265









To: sbe at sbe.org
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:39:28 -0400
From: a9xw at cs.com
Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.




  Hey... we have a freakin war with a county that "has weapons of mass
destruction" that NEVER did materialize (surprise!)
Unless you count the 22 tons of uranium yellow cake that was sent to Canada
from Iraq, and the pre war 600 truck convoy to Syria spotted by military
satellite.

Henry





-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Slentz <dan_slentz at yahoo.com>
To: sbe member discussion mail list <sbe at sbe.org>
Sent: Tue, Mar 16, 2010 2:24 pm
Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.






Please excuse the following tirade.  After reading articles every day about
the government deciding TV spectrum should go away so each American can have
wireless broadband, I finally exploded!   This might have just been done so
I could vent.  But as I read it more calmly, it really does make sense.  I'm
going to send it to my congressman and senator.  Also going to send it to an
old family friend (Congressman Zach Space).  The government simply MUST stop
with involving itself in areas that aren't "broke".  I'd say, when they have
everything else fixed, then look for other things to "fix" (or break).

But this is just my opinion.  Nothing more.  Nothing less.





This is sickening!  For about 10 years broadcasters have jumped through
hoops and converted to the new digital system.. have spent millions of
dollars+ and added services.. have built the infrastructure for "TV of the
future", and now our government decides it wants our spectrum?!!!  Why at
it, why not take away all steel and plastic from car manufacturers?  How
about taking away water from all the food growers?

What are TV broadcasters without their spectrum but a cable channel (which,
by the way, can be modulated with a $1,000 cable modulator and not a
$5,000,000+ transmitter system).  Our government IS OFF THE DEEP END and is
become nothing less than the politicians of former Communist Russia.  The
government has already taken back channels 59 thru 83 over the years, and
now they are looking at taking back the rest?  Bull crap!

The amount of spectrum they say is needed for broadband internet is so short
sighted.  They say there will be 100,000,000 homes at 100 mbps for this
proposed new service, but in just a few years 100 mbps is going to be the
equivalent of "dial-up" in terms of speed.  It wasn't that long ago that
have 56k was incredible, but now the amount of data we're pulling (like
down-loading a pirated movie) would take hours upon hours to download the
old standard.   And they're thinking 100 mbps is going to be enough?!
Whose spectrum do they intend to swipe when that isn't enough???

We wired this nation for phones with 99% of Americans now having it.  Let's
look at where we have nearly 100% coverage and determine how we can run high
speed data over power lines.  Or let's wire to every house with fiber (look
at Verizon FIoS or AT&T.)  The speed of fiber has yet to fully be tapped,
and certainly not going to be "crushed" by atmospheric conditions and any
other interference (as another national RF network will certainly do).  And
when are we going to finally decide that all this RF might just be the cause
of the continuously increasing cancer rate.  Think about that!   Who DON'T
you know that isn't getting cancer now!   So let's flood every single U.S.
house with yet MORE transmitters.   This is freakin' NUTS!

Hey.. U.S. government:..   concern yourself with a national water supply
full of toxins and poisons.. .and an increasing lack of water.  Hey... we
have a freakin war with a county that "has weapons of mass destruction" that
NEVER did materialize (surprise!)    Maybe... just maybe.. our politicians
should think about how to get the heck out of THAT mess!   What about the
homeless in America?  Wanna give them wireless broadband over the former TV
spectrum?    Hey.. here's a NOVEL IDEA... figure out how to help those
people?!!    And what about unemployement?????   How about figuring out a
way to get people back to work (instead of elmininating another industry -
TV).    This is what seriously ticks me off.  Our politicians are NOT
focusing on REAL PROBLEMS and REAL CONCERNS.  They are looking ways to screw
things up further instead of fixing REAL human issues.

The government is talking about people that aren't even using the internet
and saying "if we build it... they will come".    Hey... here's an idea.  If
they don't want it.. don't need it.. aren't asking for it..  then KEEP YOUR
NOSE OUT OF IT!!!    Here's news for you (gov't)... about 95% of the U.S.
population never used the public library.  Didn't see you going door to door
with a set of encyclopedias for every American or a library card.  LET the
people decide!

Hey politicians!!!  STOP listening to wealthy companies wanting to "do
something for Americans" (in other words..  "looking for another way to make
money")  and START LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED YOU!!!   I haven't
seen protests or huge masses saying "give us wireless intenet"... yet
somehow you feel this needs to happen.   WAKE THE H*LL UP!   When/if you
continue to push the people of this country enough... and continue to think
YOU (as politicians) know what's best for US without actually listening to
US... then you WILL find a situation that really needs your attention... and
that is civil unrest!

I, for one (but not alone), am SICK of this stuff!

STOP pissing around with TV and instead focus half that effort on our
polution, our economy, our ecology, our "war problems", our hungry, our
homeless.   Any of THESE items seem to be a cause worth fighting for?  Or is
the REAL ISSUE and problem that we need wireless 100 mbps across our
nation??!!






From: Gary O'Guinn <garyo at ktuu.com>
To: sbe member discussion mail list <sbe at sbe.org>
Sent: Tue, March 16, 2010 12:15:25 PM
Subject: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.

I have read most of the comments about the death of Free Over The Air
Broadcasting and it seems to me we broadcasters need to step up. According
to the majority of comments posted here, most of us feel that this is a
direct attack on the principals of our government mixed in with
Congressional greed. If all we are going to do is talk about this among
ourselves then nothing will be accomplished. If these issues really mean
something then we need to take an active approach. Call, write, e-mail your
Congressmen (or women). Tell them that if they allow the F.C.C. to proceed
along the path they have chosen, these Congressmen cannot count upon your
support at the polling booth. Pass the word on to your friends and family
members.

You want change in the government then it's time to step up and remind the
"Government" that this is a Government of the People, by the People and for
the People. Not a People of the Government, by the Government, and for the
Government: as it seems that many in Washington would like us to be.

Gary O'Guinn

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/sbe/attachments/20100316/41ef2654/attac
hment.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Francis Martin <ednixon at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.
To: sbe member discussion mail list <sbe at sbe.org>
Message-ID: <385844.2762.qm at web37508.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

are we not getting off topic here ?




________________________________
From: Edwin Bukont <ebukont at msn.com>
To: sbe <sbe at sbe.org>
Sent: Tue, March 16, 2010 2:15:35 PM
Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.

 Oh yeah, that's right, and we never found the exact reason for all those
underground cities designed with French and German know how.   You build a
shelter for what purpose?

Edwin Bukont CSRE, DRB, CBNT
V- 240.417.2475; F- 240.368.1265







________________________________
 To: sbe at sbe.org
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:39:28 -0400
From: a9xw at cs.com
Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.



  Hey... we have a freakin war with a county that "has weapons of mass
destruction" that NEVER did materialize (surprise!)
Unless you count the 22 tons of uranium yellow cake that was sent to Canada
from Iraq, and the pre war 600 truck convoy to Syria spotted by military
satellite.

Henry




-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Slentz <dan_slentz at yahoo.com>
To: sbe member discussion mail list <sbe at sbe.org>
Sent: Tue, Mar 16, 2010 2:24 pm
Subject: Re: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.



Please excuse the following tirade.  After reading articles every day about
the government deciding TV spectrum should go away so each American can have
wireless broadband, I finally exploded!   This might have just been done so
I could vent.  But as I read it more calmly, it really does make sense.  I'm
going to send it to my congressman and senator.  Also going to send it to an
old family friend (Congressman Zach Space).  The government simply MUST stop
with involving itself in areas that aren't "broke".  I'd say, when they have
everything else fixed, then look for other things to "fix" (or break).

But this is just my opinion.  Nothing more.  Nothing less.




This is sickening!  For about 10 years broadcasters have jumped through
hoops and converted to the new digital system.. have spent millions of
dollars+ and added services.. have built the infrastructure for "TV of the
future", and now our government decides it wants our spectrum?!!!  Why at
it, why not take away all steel and plastic from car manufacturers?  How
about taking away water from all the food growers?

What are TV broadcasters without their spectrum but a cable channel (which,
by the way, can be modulated with a $1,000 cable modulator and not a
$5,000,000+ transmitter system).  Our government IS OFF THE DEEP END and is
become nothing less than the politicians of former Communist Russia.  The
government has already taken back channels 59 thru 83 over the years, and
now they are looking at taking back the rest?  Bull crap!

The amount of spectrum they say is needed for broadband internet is so short
sighted.  They say there will be 100,000,000 homes at 100 mbps for this
proposed new service, but in just a few years 100 mbps is going to be the
equivalent of "dial-up" in terms of speed.  It wasn't that long ago that
have 56k was incredible, but now the amount of data we're pulling (like
down-loading a pirated movie) would take hours upon hours to download the
old standard.   And they're thinking 100 mbps is going to be enough?!
Whose spectrum do they intend to swipe when that isn't enough???

We wired this nation for phones with 99% of Americans now having it.  Let's
look at where we have nearly 100% coverage and determine how we can run high
speed data over power lines.  Or let's wire to every house with fiber (look
at Verizon FIoS or AT&T.)  The speed of fiber has yet to fully be tapped,
and certainly not going to be "crushed" by atmospheric conditions and any
other interference (as another national RF network will certainly do).  And
when are we going to finally decide that all this RF might just be the cause
of the continuously increasing cancer rate.  Think about that!   Who DON'T
you know that isn't getting cancer now!   So let's flood every single U.S.
house with yet MORE transmitters.   This is freakin' NUTS!

Hey.. U.S. government:..   concern yourself with a national water supply
full of toxins and poisons.. .and an increasing lack of water.  Hey... we
have a freakin war with a county that "has weapons of mass destruction" that
NEVER did materialize (surprise!)    Maybe... just maybe.. our politicians
should think about how to get the heck out of THAT mess!   What about the
homeless in America?  Wanna give them wireless broadband over the former TV
spectrum?    Hey.. here's a NOVEL IDEA... figure out how to help those
people?!!    And what about unemployement?????   How about figuring out a
way to get people back to work (instead of elmininating another industry -
TV).    This is what seriously ticks me off.  Our politicians are NOT
focusing on REAL PROBLEMS and REAL CONCERNS.  They are looking ways to screw
things up further instead of fixing REAL human issues.

The government is talking about people that aren't even using the internet
and saying "if we build it... they will come".    Hey... here's an idea.  If
they don't want it.. don't need it.. aren't asking for it..  then KEEP YOUR
NOSE OUT OF IT!!!    Here's news for you (gov't)... about 95% of the U.S.
population never used the public library.  Didn't see you going door to door
with a set of encyclopedias for every American or a library card.  LET the
people decide!

Hey politicians!!!  STOP listening to wealthy companies wanting to "do
something for Americans" (in other words..  "looking for another way to make
money")  and START LISTENING TO THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED YOU!!!   I haven't
seen protests or huge masses saying "give us wireless intenet"... yet
somehow you feel this needs to happen.   WAKE THE H*LL UP!   When/if you
continue to push the people of this country enough... and continue to think
YOU (as politicians) know what's best for US without actually listening to
US... then you WILL find a situation that really needs your attention... and
that is civil unrest!

I, for one (but not alone), am SICK of this stuff!

STOP pissing around with TV and instead focus half that effort on our
polution, our economy, our ecology, our "war problems", our hungry, our
homeless.   Any of THESE items seem to be a cause worth fighting for?  Or is
the REAL ISSUE and problem that we need wireless 100 mbps across our
nation??!!





________________________________
 From: Gary O'Guinn <garyo at ktuu.com>
To: sbe member discussion mail list <sbe at sbe.org>
Sent: Tue, March 16, 2010 12:15:25 PM
Subject: [SBE] The future of Broadcasting.

I have read most of the comments about the death of Free Over The Air
Broadcasting and it seems to me we broadcasters need to step up. According
to the majority of comments posted here, most of us feel that this is a
direct attack on the principals of our government mixed in with
Congressional greed. If all we are going to do is talk about this among
ourselves then nothing will be accomplished. If these issues really mean
something then we need to take an active approach. Call, write, e-mail your
Congressmen (or women). Tell them that if they allow the F.C.C. to proceed
along the path they have chosen, these Congressmen cannot count upon your
support at the polling booth. Pass the word on to your friends and family
members.

You want change in the government then it's time to step up and remind the
"Government" that this is a Government of the People, by the People and for
the People. Not a People of the Government, by the Government, and for the
Government: as it seems that many in Washington would like us to be.

Gary O'Guinn

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://seven.pairlist.net/pipermail/sbe/attachments/20100316/2aca6fa9/attac
hment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable
SBE mailing list
SBE at sbe.org
http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe


End of SBE Digest, Vol 264, Issue 7
***********************************
_______________________________________________
The SBE Roundtable, SBE at sbe.org
To unsubscribe, go to http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/options/sbe

http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/sbe